Indicator ENV3.2.2 Proportion of population with access to technologies that convey early warnings

NO

The “proportion of population with access to technologies that conveys early warnings” refers to the percentage or fraction of a given population that has the means to receive timely and relevant information or alerts about potential hazards, risks, or emergencies through technological channels. These technologies are designed to provide early warnings, enabling individuals to take appropriate actions to mitigate or respond to the situation effectively.

The term “technologies that conveys early warnings” encompasses various communication tools and systems that deliver critical information promptly. Examples include:

1. Mobile phones: Utilizing text messages (SMS), mobile applications, or push notifications to deliver alerts and warnings directly to individuals’ devices.

2. Radio and television: Broadcasting emergency messages via radio or television networks to reach a wide audience, particularly in areas with limited internet connectivity.

3. Internet and websites: Making use of websites, online platforms, and social media channels to disseminate early warnings and updates.

4. Warning sirens and public address systems: Deploying sound-based systems, such as sirens or loudspeakers, in public spaces to alert people about imminent dangers.

5. Weather monitoring systems: Leveraging meteorological instruments, such as weather stations, satellites, and radars, to detect and predict severe weather conditions and communicate warnings to the population.

The proportion of the population with access to such technologies indicates the extent to which individuals can receive critical information swiftly, helping them make informed decisions and take appropriate actions during emergencies or hazardous situations.

The concept behind using the indicator “Proportion of population with access to technologies that conveys early warnings” is to assess the level of preparedness and resilience of a population in the face of potential hazards or emergencies. It provides insight into the extent to which individuals can receive timely information and warnings, enabling them to take appropriate actions to protect themselves and their communities.

Here are some key points related to this concept:

1. Disaster risk reduction: By measuring the proportion of the population with access to early warning technologies, policymakers and organizations can gauge the effectiveness of their efforts in reducing disaster risks. It helps identify gaps in communication systems and infrastructure that need improvement to enhance preparedness.

2. Vulnerability reduction: Early warnings are particularly crucial for vulnerable populations who may have limited access to resources or face greater challenges during emergencies. Monitoring the proportion of these populations with access to early warning technologies helps ensure their needs are addressed and vulnerabilities are reduced.

3. Timely response and preparedness: Early warnings play a vital role in enabling individuals and communities to respond promptly and effectively to emergencies. The indicator helps evaluate the readiness of a population to receive and respond to warnings, which can save lives, minimize damage, and enhance overall resilience.

4. Communication infrastructure development: Assessing the proportion of the population with access to early warning technologies helps identify areas where communication infrastructure needs to be strengthened or expanded. It supports the development and investment in technologies that can disseminate warnings efficiently and reach a larger number of people.

5. Monitoring progress and impact: Over time, tracking changes in the proportion of the population with access to early warning technologies allows for monitoring progress in disaster risk reduction efforts. It helps measure the impact of interventions, policies, and investments aimed at improving the dissemination of early warnings.

By focusing on this indicator, policymakers and organizations can work towards bridging the digital divide, improving information dissemination mechanisms, and ensuring that all segments of the population have equal access to technologies that convey early warnings, thereby enhancing overall preparedness and resilience in the face of disasters and emergencies.

technology devices, urban, rural,

The rationale for monitoring the “Proportion of population with access to technologies that conveys early warnings” is rooted in the importance of timely information dissemination during emergencies or potential hazards. Here are some key rationales for monitoring this indicator:

1. Enhancing disaster preparedness: Access to early warning technologies is crucial for individuals and communities to be prepared for and respond effectively to emergencies. Monitoring the proportion of the population with access to these technologies helps identify gaps in preparedness and prioritize efforts to improve communication infrastructure and systems.

2. Ensuring inclusivity and equity: Monitoring access to early warning technologies helps ensure that all segments of the population, including vulnerable groups, have equal opportunities to receive timely information. It helps identify disparities and address issues of inclusivity and equity, ensuring that no one is left behind in disaster risk reduction efforts.

3. Saving lives and reducing damage: Timely access to early warnings can save lives, reduce injuries, and minimize damage during emergencies. By monitoring the proportion of the population with access to these technologies, policymakers and organizations can assess the effectiveness of their efforts in providing critical information and enhancing the chances of a timely response.

4. Supporting informed decision-making: Early warnings enable individuals to make informed decisions regarding evacuation, sheltering, or other necessary actions. Monitoring access to early warning technologies ensures that people have the necessary information to make these decisions promptly and effectively, thereby reducing the impact of disasters.

5. Improving response and recovery: Access to early warning technologies not only helps in early preparedness but also facilitates a more coordinated response and efficient recovery after an event. Monitoring the proportion of the population with access to these technologies allows for the evaluation of response systems and the identification of areas where improvements can be made.

6. Strengthening resilience: By monitoring this indicator, policymakers and organizations can track progress in increasing access to early warning technologies over time. It helps identify success stories, challenges, and opportunities for further strengthening resilience and disaster risk reduction efforts.

Overall, monitoring the proportion of the population with access to technologies that convey early warnings provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of communication systems, identifies areas for improvement, and ensures that individuals and communities are better prepared to face emergencies and potential hazards.

The computation method for measuring the “Proportion of population with access to technologies that conveys early warnings” can vary depending on the specific context and available data. Here’s a general approach to calculating this indicator:

1. Define the target population: Determine the specific population or geographic area for which you want to measure access to early warning technologies. It could be a national population, a specific region, or a community.

2. Identify relevant technologies: Determine the technologies that are considered early warning systems in the context you are assessing. This may include mobile phones, internet access, radio and television networks, weather monitoring systems, etc.

3. Collect data on technology access: Gather data on the availability and usage of the identified technologies within the target population. This can be obtained through surveys, census data, or existing reports from relevant agencies or organizations.

4. Determine access criteria: Define the criteria for considering someone to have access to early warning technologies. For example, it could be based on ownership or regular usage of mobile phones, internet access at home or public facilities, access to radio or television broadcasts, etc.

5. Calculate the proportion: Calculate the proportion of the target population that meets the access criteria for each technology. Divide the number of individuals with access by the total population and multiply by 100 to obtain the percentage.

   Proportion = (Number of individuals with access / Total population) x 100

6. Aggregate the proportions: If you are assessing multiple technologies, calculate the proportion for each technology separately, and then aggregate them to obtain an overall measure. This could be done by averaging the proportions or assigning different weights based on the significance of each technology.

7. Interpretation and analysis: Analyze the calculated proportion to understand the level of access to early warning technologies within the population. Compare the results over time or across different regions or demographic groups to identify disparities, trends, or improvements in access.

It’s important to note that the accuracy and reliability of the measurement depend on the quality and representativeness of the data collected. Additionally, the specific context and objectives may require customization of the computation method.

13.1, 13.1.1, 13.2.1 (R), (Tier 3)

percentage

10 years